Jefferson County, MO Foreclosure Case

I filed the OPPT documents against a consent order of possession (the bank’s possession of my home) on January 18. The bank was to take possession on January 15. I have heard nothing from the court since.

My attorney did email me and ask me to call him, but before I could, he called me. He told me these “UCC things” never work and that I was setting myself up for a lawsuit. When I asked him on what grounds the lawsuit was, he didn’t answer but did explain that UCC was not the way to go.

I asked him why it would be wrong for me to ask the judges and attorneys to produce evidence of their authority to basically try this case in my absence, and he said that “wasn’t the point.”

He also said he had a 32 page lawsuit ready to file against the bank, had hired associates to help him with it, and if I didn’t file it I was making a mistake. He said we’d talk later.
In the meantime, this attorney is on the list of debtors on my UCC-1 because the contract we had stated he would get 1/3 the value of my home plus 35% of anything monetary. Although he’d said he would file a wrongful foreclosure lawsuit against the bank last year, he never did. But now he has one ready?

The Declaration of Violation of Rights appears so far to be a powerful document.
My county has had so many foreclosures (I know, it’s everywhere) but I know from what I see here that people have just given up. The foreclosure mill, Millsap & Singer, is nationwide, and they are vicious. It’s not hard to see why people are giving up.

I am NOT giving up! The next step is to get my UCC1 filed in the county recorder’s office, it basically puts a lien against all deeds. Since the bank filed deeds in ownership of my property, this is something I MUST get done right away. The recorder’s rules don’t allow for these documents, but I’m going to tell them to file them anyway after I get evidence of the recorder’s corporate affiliation.

NOTE TO SELF: Put LOTS OF LOVE into these documents! The negative energy fueling fear will come at you – at least it did to me – without the support of my OPPT family I would’ve had a hard time fending them off! They are still there, snarling and snapping, but at a distance. The more I put love around those who have done wrong in the court system, and a bubble of protection over all of us here in Missouri, the better I feel.

In case of a “visit” by corporate agents, I put up a LAWFUL NOTICE at each of my doorways.

You can find all the documents I created in this case, along with the LAWFUL NOTICE I posted (lamination only cost $1.10) here http://www.scribd.com/collections/4101516/OPPT-FILINGS-SUE-RHOADES

With much love,
Sue Rhoades

Good for you, Sue, for having the courage to stand your ground. It's very difficult to go against the grain; to go against everything we have been taught to believe for decades. It's like believing the earth is flat and then being told it's round.

Super - good for you - not to give up.

I think your 100% correct to put a lot of love into your documents!

Whoohoo -- way to be strong

I am assuming you did file the "Declaration of Violation of Rights" since you mentioned it, but just trying to make sure we have a complete list of everything you filed for future reference. Thank you for spending the time to keep everyone up to date.

The Declaration of Violation of Rights can be found here:

http://www.scribd.com/my_document_collections/4101516

I did have trouble uploading some docs yesterday -- let me know if you have trouble seeing it.

Thanks
Sue

Way to go, Sue! Thank you so much for sharing and posting all of your documents.

I am just getting ready to file my UCC1 and the posting of your documents has really helped me get a clearer picture of how mine should be filled out.

Did you file your UCC1 online with the secretary of state? Or did you make a personal visit?

So gratefull for you, this forum and OPPT and the glorious unfolding of ALL of this.

Peace to you

Lisa

Hi Lisa,

I filed my UCC1 online, on the secretary of state's website. After you submit it you have the opportunity to print out what you filed plus a separate confirmation sheet.

That needs to be filed in the county recorder's office. The recorder's office here, according to their "rules," won't file it but I intend to go there anyway. I noticed the "bank" was able to file a "Miscellaneous document" there when they counterfeited the deed to put it in their name via their attorneys....what is to prevent me from filing my own "Miscellaneous document?"

It is January 27 and I have heard zero from the court, the sheriff's dept., or any attorney. I am sending lots of love to this misguided court system and its helpers. The sheriff's department's Assistant Commander told me once, proudly, that they operate under "color of law." Had she known what she was saying to me, I don't think she would've said it with such pride.

Hi Sue. I am passing along a little instruction that I haven't tried myself but it seems reasonable...

1. Print out the notice to the county clerk (content below) to take with you before you go to the clerks office.

2. Affix a sticky note on the document with the following words on it. (Record on demand as is in public notice section of record per (proper name) remove this note before scanning)

3. Go to your county recorders office.

4. Ask them for their business card when you get there so that you can have there contact information.

5.Take a digital voice recorder with you and keep it on and recording at all times. Keep your mouth in check as much as possible. Remember! They are to follow the instructions on the sticky note. If they refuse, if they tell you “I have to have you notarize this” “I can’t do that” “I don’t understand what you want” “I’m just a stupid clerk I have no brain of my own” “You have to swear an oath before I can file this” all of these responses are attempts to avoid public record. When this ignorance occurs hand them the (notice to the clerk) notice and say “you have just been put on notice.” Let them read the notice then tell them again to follow the instructions on the sticky note. You may want to ask... “I wonder what the office of inspector general would think about this, you know the justice department” At this point they have 2 options
1. Do as you have demanded, as you demanded, or
2. Become a felon.
If they pick the second your next move is to indict them. Remember it is your duty to indict any and all who commit a crime.

6. If they become felons you can go to any other county recorders office and file the documents there.


The content of the Notice to Clerk is as follows:

Notice of understanding and intent
Notice to agent is notice to principal notice to principal is notice to agent.
This notice has been presented upon the refusal to file document as is on public record.
This Notice is served upon you, hereinafter “clerk“, “officer”, “you”, “your”, “you’re”, or “yourself”, acting as a local agent for or on the ultimate behalf of THE STATE OF (YOURSTATE), some political subdivision of THE STATE OF (YOURSTATE), or any other legal entity in whatever form, hereinafter referred to collectively as STATE.

It is my understanding that the following united states code is applicable to you.
18 USC 1506
Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States, whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect; or
Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance, bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

You have been warned and properly noticed now of the potential circumstances of your actions if you proceed to act in contrary to 18 USC 1506. Any action taken by you in contrast to 18 USC 1506 shall be met with indictment under said act.
Govern yourself accordingly.
--------
Anyway, I thought I would share this with you...

Art

Excerpt from the article at: http://americankabuki.blogspot.com/2013/01/new-yorks-us-bankruptcy-court-rules.html#more
"As I predicted two weeks ago, MERS would be dead within weeks. Judge Grossman has driven the final stake through its black heart. The half of America's homeowners whose mortgages are registered at MERS have been handed a "get out of jail free" card. Wall Street has no right to foreclose on their property. The tide has turned. It won't be easy, but homeowners in those states with judicial foreclosures now have Judge Grossman on their side. Those in the other states (just over half) will have a tougher time because they can lose their home before they ever get to court. But the law is still on their side -- foreclosure by members of MERS is theft -- so class action lawsuits may be the way to go."

Don't know how this applies in Missouri. You wouldn't want to stop what you are doing with OPPT for sure as this may take time to filter and they may appeal to the Supreme Court on this.

funkyjomedina wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/l-randall-wray/new-yorks-us-bankruptcy-c_b_824167.html?utm_hp_ref=email_share

This article is almost 2 years old.

American Kabuki just posted that today. Goes to show one should always check the dates and sources before passing along. Thank you for the correction.

Good Day Sue!

Somehow my previous post for this is not showing up for me - so forgive me if this is a duplicate:)

I noticed your UCC 1 filing is 24 pages due to the Section 4 collateral description. Did you use/copy exact verbage from one of the OPPT documents for this sectrion? If so - which one please?

This is still a bit mind boggling. I also noticed on your UCC Financing Statement this:

UCC FINANCINGSTATEMENT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, UCC Doc. # 2000043135, and ORI-01182013-0001 the perpetuity, are hereby duly amended only to include the followingadditional collateral as follows:

Can you explain what this ORI number is? I do not see it on the OPPT template?

Thank you so very much!!

Peace and Love in Light to you and all of your efforts Sue!!!

Lisa

Is the UCC Financing Statement also filed separatly with the State or is this to be filed at the county level?

Much gratitude and thanks!!

Peace in Love and Light

Lisa

Hi Lisa,

Those numbers came from the first set of templates that came out, with Heather's handwriting on them, and from an answer to a question that pertained to my situation on RTS's blog.

I haven't had a chance to research every number yet but I hope to soon and post the results.

As far as the MERS case, that was the case that Obama made the "deal" with the states, to "give them money" to use as they saw fit. Our wonderful governor decided to use most of it for the "general fund" (his pocket). I know of one person who was told she would get $2,000, she lost her home and much more money than that due to a short sale, so it's obvious to me this is another bank bailout. My friend says the money will have to go towards back taxes they owe on the short sale! The PTW know how to steal, don't they?? NOT ANY MORE.

Art...
Great info! Thank you!

Thank you so very much for that clarification. I send love and light to you and all those involved in your process.

Peace in Love and Light
Lisa

I heard someone talking about this, I think it was on radio Syncretism Freedom Reigns show Jan 27th. They said this must be done to poperly file, maybe you already knew this, just thought I would add incase anyone didn't realise it.

Hi Sue,

I was just listening to Freedom Reigns and Lisa Tucci (Heather's mother) say that the UCC, Declaration, etc. have to be sent to the banks, etc. three times, separated by 72 hours and then you can foreclose. What's your reaction to that?

Ira

I have been trying to get my head around how the UCC filing by TOPPT have put the inferior legal under the superior common law and how it effects what is going on in the legal NOW. If we all own everything equally then it is really a question of right of use not ownership.

The next step then would be that if you have been using something then how would another have the right to have the use of that something over another, if the other is not keen on giving it up. How would the common law approach resolve this?

If the legal system has lost it's ethical heart based unbiased and fair approach to resolving issues, but then has the power to enforce something unfair or unethical. Then the common law must be the arena to solve this type of issue.

I listened to Heathers mother Lois talk about needing to file three times, but then the question of enforcement came up if i remember correctly. She then deferred the issue to Heather, who was not available at that time.

Suerhoades, It may be that doing all the right things legally in an arena run by the banksters, can be done, and still if their intent is to ignore, your filings it should be considered at their common law peril. If the CVAC governments are based on Common law, I would declare and notice everyone doing you harm the cost to them personally, in making you do something against your wishes, and make it substantial, if it comes to that.

Now I just read a bit that the CVAC's are keeping the PTW in their place, here it is cut and paste from removing the shackles, note highlighted in red. Love to you and your family Sue.

@lisa: CVAC and all BRANCHES definitely can be used by the one people...however, Absolute Data (not one piece missing) is coming out now...do the people want to make an "interim decision" or an informed conscious choice based on the Absolute Data? Do they want to make the conscious choice to not be responsbile and be governed or do they want to make the conscious choice to be responsible and practice self-governance? FOR NOW, THE CVAC and all BRANCHES reserved are holding the PTW in their place so that the one people of this planet of the opportunity to receive all the data and make an informed choice by their free will, each one.

@lisa: enforcement...we are DO'ing the mechanics of enforcement now...the one people's part in the enforcement? Please, DO keep consciously choosing to BE and DO...that has more effect then you know...that is one of the vital keys to the mechanics of enforcement that is being DONE now. Full context and knowing of the mechanics of the enforcement shall be visible after it is DONE.
similar to the same template the Public Trust did in the foreclosure...we told you after the mechanics were done....

@lisa: 2. practical steps?....BE creative in DO'ing...BE in glory...and the DO'ing can only be glorious!!!!! There is no manual to BE'ing...that is something that is with IN every One
did I answer your questions, Lisa?
I went point by point...

igoodone wrote:Hi Sue,

I was just listening to Freedom Reigns and Lisa Tucci (Heather's mother) say that the UCC, Declaration, etc. have to be sent to the banks, etc. three times, separated by 72 hours and then you can foreclose. What's your reaction to that?

Ira

I am waiting for more information to come out, I know this was done by OPPT for the planet already, and I am a trustee/bondservant of OPPT on record, so I am wondering why three times would apply to me specifically as I am one of The People. If you find more information on this, please share it. I intend to send the bill at least one time with a clear request to rebut and a time limit, and go from there. My main issue right now is getting it into the county recorder's office as their rules are strict as to what can be recorded, even though there is no law on record as to what can and cannot be put on the record. I'm researching this right now.

I agree... I don't understand the need either. It sounds as though we are trying to give them as many options as possible to come back against the filing. Anything else... 1 filing is considered plenty as it is a public filing. I'm not saying the filing 3 times is wrong, but it goes against what I believe to be right.

Is there a way to remove my New Topics from the wrong spot? (Sorry, I'm somewhat new to forum posting) I made two New Topics that should be reserved for two new filings. I would to remove them if someone can tell me how.

Thanks.

Three's are very powerful in that corrupt system. To be simple, as I have found in my research the first doc is
the claim... Rebut if you can...

the second doc
Notice of dishonor... Rebut is required...

The third doc
Notice of default... Last chance to rebut...

After that it would be rather difficult for anyone to say they didn't know. Look at the system currently. If you fail to pay some debt, you get three notices before they take action... In court, an objection three times automatically is upheld.

Don't know the codified reasons for this but it's everywhere.